NASA Space Apps 2026 · Flame in Freefall
Fire behaves differently
when nothing rises.
MicroFire Atlas turns NASA's microgravity combustion tests into traceable evidence for safer spacecraft, and shows exactly where that evidence stops.
Every value links to its NASA page. Scenery is illustration; the evidence is real.
Choose your mission
One question. Nine steps. Every claim traceable.
What does NASA actually know about PMMA fire in a future lunar habitat? Challenge Mode answers end to end on one page, then hands you a Mission Evidence Brief.
- 01Find
- 02Compare
- 03Summarize
- 04Rank
- 05Interpret
- 06AI
- 07Uncertainty
- 08Next experiment
- 09Traceability
Experience the evidence
Real NASA footage, computer-vision measurements, matched NASA tests and NASA's own findings, in one instrument.
NASA observation
This isn't animation. NASA burned this material in space.
Saffire VI, inside an uncrewed Cygnus cargo ship at the end of the NG-19 mission: a one-sided PMMA sample, filmed by NASA and shown at the speed NASA released it.
- Experiment
- Saffire VI
- Material
- PMMA, burning on one side
- Not stated
- Oxygen, pressure and airflow for this clip
Research Frontier
Where NASA's evidence stops
MicroFire Atlas refuses to fabricate conclusions when evidence stops. Every cell is counted from the real records: gravity against oxygen.
✓ 5 known△ 2 partial? 11 unknown
| GravityO₂ % | < 17 | 17–19 | 19–21.5 | 21.5–26 | 26–31 | ≥ 31 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orbitmicrogravity | ||||||
| Moonlunar g · simulated only | ||||||
| MarsMartian g |
Pins: A = Exploration atmosphere A · 34 % O₂ · 56.5 kPa; B = Alternate atmosphere · 28.5 % O₂ · 66.2 kPa; ISS = ISS cabin · 21 % O₂ · 101.3 kPa. Earth gravity is not a row: this atlas holds no 1-g tests, and NASA screens materials on Earth with a separate standard.
Moon · ≥ 31 % O₂ Unknown: data gap
A Exploration atmosphere A · 34 % O₂ · 56.5 kPa
No NASA test in this atlas burned here. MicroFire shows the closest evidence, names the experiment that would fill this cell, and gives no outcome.
What experiment would close this gap?Evidence status
A NASA test record or a NASA quotation, checked against the source PDF when the site is built. 78 records and 62 quotes; one wrong number fails the build.
Analogous evidence: a real NASA test that differs from your condition in named ways (for example Saffire VI at 54 kPa and 29–31 % O₂, in orbit rather than on the Moon). Shown with every difference marked.
Mechanism-only or conditional evidence: droplet and gas flames (FLEX, ACME), two simulated lunar-gravity burns (LUCI), and FM², which is planned with no results yet. Never treated as a material outcome.
No NASA record covers the condition. MicroFire abstains: it shows the closest evidence, names the experiment that would close the gap, and the AI Model Lab blocks any prediction.
Limitations we state up front
- A curated atlas of 78 records, not the complete NASA combustion archive.
- Similarity, ranking and coverage scores are MicroFire heuristics, never NASA ratings.
- No safe or unsafe ratings, risk scores or fire probabilities anywhere.
- Flame Vision reports pixels; NASA publishes no calibration for the footage.
How MicroFire thinks
- ObserveNASA test tables, footage and reports
- ExtractTyped records in NASA's own units and words
- ValidateEvery quote and number checked against the PDF
- CompareEvidence Ladder and ranking with stability checks
- ExplainAI synthesis, then claim-by-claim verification
- AbstainNo number where NASA has not tested
Investigate deeper
Decades of NASA fire research sit in separate reports. Here a researcher can:
